Banning social media for young people

Is it a realistic solution?

On November 28 2025 under 16s will be banned from social media in Australia. Banning under 16s is not the best solution; as a short-term measure that makes Big Tech gatekeepers sit up and take notice, it could make a difference, especially if other countries follow suit.

That would allow time to develop a more coordinated and systemic solution, ideally globally, at least regionally. Why is that needed?

Firstly, there are few, if any, specific large-scale studies as evidence to back-up the claim the young people are more vulnerable to social media than other age groups.

To say social media can cause associated mental health problems and children are more vulnerable, sounds logical. Even so, in the absence of appropriate research, there's nothing specific or nuanced to guide policy-makers. A growing number of institutions are questioning this and petitioning for proper analyses.

The American Psychological Association (APA) reported in 2023 that social media โ€œ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ป๐—ผ๐˜ ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐—น๐˜† ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ณ๐˜‚๐—น ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐˜๐—ผ ๐˜†๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฒโ€. On the other hand, a study by the Alan Turing Institute in the UK found that nearly ๐Ÿต๐Ÿฌ% ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿด-๐Ÿฏ๐Ÿฐ ๐˜†๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ ๐—ผ๐—น๐—ฑ'๐˜€ ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ฑ ๐˜„๐—ถ๐˜๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ณ๐˜‚๐—น ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฒ ๐—บ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ.

In 2017, a New York hospital found that ๐Ÿต๐Ÿณ% ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐˜†๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐˜„๐—ถ๐˜๐—ต ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—บ๐—ผ๐—ผ๐—ฑ ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€ ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐˜€๐—ผ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฎ. In 2023, the Journal of Mood and Anxiety Disorders said that ๐Ÿณ๐Ÿฑ% ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐˜€๐˜‚๐—ณ๐—ณ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ณ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—บ ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—บ๐—ผ๐—ผ๐—ฑ ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€ ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐˜€๐—ผ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฎ, ๐—ป๐—ผ๐˜ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ณ๐—ณ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฎ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ฒ.

In summary, a patchwork of contradictory data, and this is just four data points of many.

๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜ ๐˜€๐—ผ๐—น๐˜‚๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ผ๐—ฏ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ด๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ด๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—บ ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ด๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ต๐—บ๐˜€ ๐˜„๐—ถ๐˜๐—ต ๐—ฎ ๐—ฑ๐˜‚๐˜๐˜†-๐—ผ๐—ณ-๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ถ๐˜‡๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜€, ๐—ป๐—ผ๐˜ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐˜€๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ณ๐˜† ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ต๐—ผ๐—น๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€.

Guided by proper evidentiary studies, ideally globally coordinated, recognizing there will be fierce, politicised resistance, because the internet has already pushed large parts of society beyond facts. That would take years. In the interim, regulation and bans might be the only recourse, but without proper evidence they could backfire, badly.

ยฉ 2025 Oliver Spalding. All rights reserved. HITMXEยฎ is a registered trademark of Oliver Spalding.

This post is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution. You may share this content with attribution, but not modify or use it commercially without written permission.

Previous
Previous

How to respond to difficult situations.

Next
Next

An appeal to the media